To The Skeptic's Dictionary - Table of Contents

Roswell

In 1947, during a severe thunderstorm near Roswell, New Mexico, UFOers got the best 4th of July fireworks display imaginable. But it wasn't a natural display of lightning; it was something from another world. Unfortunately, none of them witnessed the big bang of UFOlogy: the alleged crash landing of an alien spacecraft complete with little aliens who weren't burned beyond recognition. The actual crash site was on the Foster ranch 75 miles north of Roswell, which now houses two UFO museums and an annual alien festival. This seems a bit unfair, since the closest town is actually Corona, New Mexico, but Roswell is the nearest military base and, allegedly, that's where the remains of the alien craft and its occupants were taken. William "Mac" Brazel (rhymes with dazzle) , foreman of the Foster Ranch, along with a 7-year old girl, Dee Proctor, found the most famous debris in modern history. They'd never seen anything like it before and millions now agree: the stuff was strange. Worse, the Air Force wasn't consistent in its claims as to what the debris was. What more proof does one need that this was the beginning of a massive government conspiracy to hide from the general public that the aliens have landed? Some even believe that the dead aliens weren't the first and that the U.S. government has signed a treaty with the aliens. If so, let's hope our government is more faithful with the aliens than it was with Native Americans.

Skeptics agree that something crashed near Roswell in 1947, but not an alien craft. Skeptical explanations have varied from weather balloons to secret aircraft to espionage devices, but current conventional wisdom among skeptics is that what was found on the Brazel ranch was part of Project Mogul, a top secret project testing giant, high-flying balloons to detect Soviet nuclear explosions.

To UFOers, Roswell is the resurrection. They've got witnesses, they've got inexplicable debris, eyewitness accounts of the little fella, they've got proof after proof of government and media conspiracy and cover-up. They've even got a dubious alien autopsy film shown to more than 10 million people in August 1995 on the Fox network. They've got Mecca.

Roswell is a full-blown enterprise, complete with a book (The Roswell Incident) by Charles Berlitz of Atlantis and Bermuda Triangle fame. The amount of energy expended on Roswell could probably support several alien galaxies for a million aeons. It is enough to make a person believe in cold fusion.

See related entries on alien abductions, Area 51 and UFOs.


further reading

  • Report of Air Force Research Regarding the "Roswell Incident" July 1994
  • Skeptic's Newletter Account
  • The CB1 Roswell Resource Centre
  • UFO Folklore

    Sagan, Carl. The Demon-Haunted World - Science as a Candle in the Dark, ch. 5, "Spoofing and Secrecy" (New York: Random House, 1995).


    reader comments

    01 Aug 1996
    I've just begun reading your dictionary. I must say I'm not an avid believer of paranormal phenomena. I think some people would believe just about anything to give life more meaning and to plug some of their soul's loopholes about their purpose on this earth. Nonetheless, I do find your rebuttal of UFOs not only symptomatic of cynical skepticism, but also very obstinate.

    reply: First of all, what I have written is not a "rebuttal" or any other kind of butt. Secondly, I take it that "cynical skepticism" is skepticism applied to something you believe in. Fair enough. Anyway, you might have gotten more bite by saying that my argument is obstinately skeptical and also very cynical. Still, you'd be wrong. To be cynical is to be scornful of the motives or virtue of others, or to bitterly mock or sneer at them. 'Cynical' is too strong a word. I'm a skeptic and I'm obstinate and proud of it, but I wouldn't say I'm cynical nor is my argument against the belief that aliens landed on earth in 1947 at Roswell. Anyway, let's get to the meat of this debate. I'm sure the world can't wait to hear what we have to say on this earth shattering subject.

    As you said, it is probable we are not the only intelligent beings in existence. Out of the billions of stars out there, maybe only a couple million would harbor planets where life could develop. Maybe only a small percent of that number would have more intelligent life forms than earth. We cannot as terrans make predictions as to how these life forms would think, much less extrapolate on their motives for visiting other worlds. How can we explain other worldly life forms when we can't even explain our own? How do you explain the fact that there is a species of insect that incubates 17 years in the ground and lives only one day subsequent to hatching?

    I think we're losing our audience here. Let's get to the point.

    I don't believe in abductions, but I believe there is just too much evidence supporting the fact that we are visited by more advanced life forms to simply say that witnesses are deluded, and though most don't have ulterior motives, they didn't really see what they claimed to have seen.

    Now we're talking! Let's get to this evidence.

    Let's talk about Roswell. Why doesn't the U.S. government release the files pertaining to the 1947 incident to the public if nothing really did happen. They quote national security as a reason for not disclosing information. National security? What does national security have to do with it if nothing really happened.

    The government has released information on Roswell, but if the government released every file in the universe relating to aliens, what do you think the response would be from those camping out near Area 51 or those going to the UFO museums in Roswell? You can't trust the government! Those files are fake files, meant to deceive us! Only a fool would believe the government is releasing real files. And the reason they aren't releasing those fake files is because they have so much to hide! If they didn't, why don't they release the fake files? Huh? You see, people, it's as simple as ABC. You know it. I know it, but the buttpickers in Washington just don't get it.

    I believe extremism of any kind is the nemesis of the truly open mind. Unfortunately, your obstinate skepticism is a form of extremism.

    Good, because I don't mind being called an extremist. It's better than being called a cynic. Or a nemesis.

    You seem to have a very analytical mind. The type that warrants scientific explanation in order to validate an existence, an event, a process. Sometimes life holds mysteries that just cannot be explained in this manner. You should open up your mind, and although you shouldn't believe everything you hear, you should try to accept certain things as unexplained but plausible.

    Regards
    Joey Koon

    Joey, far be it from me to claim that life is not full of mysteries. Life itself is a great mystery. I'm a mystery to myself. Some things can't be explained. We don't have enough data in some cases. In other cases, we'll never have enough data. Why mysteries are so intriguing is a mystery. Still, it is a quantum leap of faith to jump from "mystery" to "plausible" in the case Roswell and the ten little aliens.


    8 Aug 1996
    Hmm... I start wondering who are the real true believers out there when I read your statement on the Roswell crash. All it says is: Something crashed in the desert near Roswell and everybody who believes that the crash was of alien origin is crazy. reply: Are you crazy? If you read what I said and think I said that everyone who believes the crash was of alien origin is crazy then you are crazy. I never said that, and only a crazy person would say that I did. It would be crazy to believe that everyone is crazy who believes aliens landed at Roswell and signed a treaty with the U.S. Government.

    This is despite the fact that over 100 witnesses plus highly ranked military personell support that theory. One of the military (Jesse Marcel I think) even said on his deathbed that the craft was not of this earth (would you lie on your deathbed??).

    My mother taught me never to lie, especially on my deathbed. However, she also taught me how to make reasonable inferences. Just because a person is dying and believes something is true, doesn't make his or her belief true and it doesn't make the person a liar if he or she is wrong.

    Second, do you REALLY think that the only airfield in the world that holds nuclear weapons would mistake a crashed disc for a weather ballon? (In case you didn't know, General Ramey issued a press release stating that the debris was from a "crashed disc" from space.) I wouldnt trust them with nuclear weapons in my life.

    Good for General Ramey, but I thought you wouldn't trust these military types. Why do you trust this particular general and the other 100 you mentioned but not the ones who were there and can't confirm these allegations?

    I seriously doubt that you even bothered to find out anything about the crash before you wrote the article. Just because the scenario doesn't fit in your narrowminded view of the world you dismiss it as fantasy. And don't try to throw the autopsy film in my face 'cause I think that is a fake. I would be glad for a reply.
    Christian Lundkvist

    My mother also taught me not to throw films at faces, especially alien autopsy films. But I am encouraged by your expression "serious doubts." You may make a good skeptic someday after all.


    The Skeptic's Dictionary
    by
    Robert Todd Carroll